center for victim research repository

Evaluation of the Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification Program, Final Report

Show simple item record Irazola, Seri Williamson, Erin Niedzwiecki, Emily Debus-Sherill, Sara Stricker, Julie 2017-11-27T22:27:21Z 2017-11-27T22:27:21Z 2013
dc.identifier.citation Irazola, Seri; Williamson, Erin; Niedzwiecki, Emily; Debus-Sherill, Sara; Stricker, Julie. (2013). Evaluation of the Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification Program, Final Report. ICF International, 358 pgs. en_US
dc.identifier.govdoc NCJ 243839
dc.description Report en_US
dc.description.abstract This report presents the findings and methodology of an evaluation of the federally funded automated victim notification (AVN) system, which intends to provide crime victims timely and accurate information on court events and status changes in the course of their case processing. To date, 47 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico operate some form of AVN system. Evaluation findings suggest that States have implemented AVN systems under a diverse set of structural designs. Underlying these structural differences are issues related to program operation, program administration, stakeholder participation, and target population. In developing and implementing AVN, the evaluation advises that States must decide whether they want a vendor-based or in-house system, as well as whether AVN services will be available to all public users or closed/restricted to a subpopulation (e.g., victims and criminal justice professionals). The evaluation identified benefits and limitations for each type of system. The evaluation also determined that administrative structure and stakeholder “buy-in” are critical to AVN success. Generally, States are advised to limit the number of individuals responsible for the financial and operational management of an AVN system and develop a system to reduce turnover. In addition, States should provide comprehensive AVN services in all facilities that have contact with offenders. There should be one system that allows for seamless registration and, when applicable, under one vendor contract. In addition, victims should be informed about what services are and are not provided through the AVN system. Although this evaluation was not designed to examine the extent to which AVN provided victim notification in a legally sufficient manner, evaluation findings suggest the need for additional research to determine whether legal mandates are met through AVN systems. Evaluation methodology and limitations are explained. Case study reports, 12 references, and appended evaluation instruments, legislative profiles, and AVN system profiles. (CVRL Note: see related issue briefs on various characteristics, use, and victim-focused practices in implementing AVN systems: NCJ 243842, NCJ 243843, NCJ 243840, and NCJ 243841.) (NCJRS Abstract) en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher ICF International en_US
dc.subject Program Evaluation en_US
dc.subject Victim Rights en_US
dc.subject Outcomes en_US
dc.subject Outreach en_US
dc.subject Technology Services en_US
dc.subject Crime Victim Notification en_US
dc.subject Victim Notification System en_US
dc.subject Automated Victim Notification Service en_US
dc.subject Service Providers en_US
dc.subject Courts en_US
dc.subject Prisons en_US
dc.subject Case Management en_US
dc.subject Reentry en_US
dc.subject Parole en_US
dc.subject Domestic Violence en_US
dc.subject Intimate Partner Violence en_US
dc.subject Spouse Abuse en_US
dc.title Evaluation of the Statewide Automated Victim Information and Notification Program, Final Report en_US
dc.type Other en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record



My Account