center for victim research repository

Systematic Review of Violence Prevention Economic Evaluations, 2000–2019

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Peterson, Cora
dc.contributor.author Kearns, Megan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-06-04T20:01:08Z
dc.date.available 2021-06-04T20:01:08Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Peterson, Cora & Kearns, Megan. (2021). Systematic Review of Violence Prevention Economic Evaluations, 2000–2019. American Journal of Preventive Medicine: 60(4), 552-562https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.11.002 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7987799/
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11990/2218
dc.description.abstract Context: Health economic evaluations (e.g., cost-effectiveness analysis) can guide the efficient use of resources to improve health outcomes. This study aims to summarize the content and quality of interpersonal violence prevention economic evaluations. Evidence acquisition: In 2020, peer-reviewed journal articles published during 2000–2019 focusing on high-income countries were identified using index terms in multiple databases. Study content, including violence type prevented (e.g., child abuse and neglect), outcome measure (e.g., abusive head trauma clinical diagnosis), intervention type (e.g., education program), study methods, and results were summarized. Studies reporting on selected key methods elements essential for study comparison and public health decision making (e.g., economic perspective, time horizon, discounting, currency year) were assessed. Evidence synthesis: A total of 28 economic evaluation studies were assessed, most of which reported that assessed interventions yielded good value for money. Physical assault in the community and child abuse and neglect were the most common violence types examined. Studies applied a wide variety of cost estimates to value avoided violence. Less than two thirds of the studies reported all the key methods elements. Conclusions: Comprehensive data collection on violence averted and intervention costs in experimental settings can increase opportunities to identify interventions that generate long-term value. More comprehensive estimates of the cost of violence can improve opportunities to demonstrate how prevention investment can be offset through avoided future costs. Better adherence to health economic evaluation reporting standards can enhance comparability across studies and may increase the likelihood that economic evidence is included in violence prevention decision making. [CVRL Note: includes associated data] (Author Abstract) en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American Journal of Preventive Medicine en_US
dc.subject Systematic Review en_US
dc.subject Cost of Victimization en_US
dc.subject Costs of Crime en_US
dc.subject Economic Evaluations en_US
dc.subject Cost Benefit Analysis en_US
dc.subject Violent Victimization en_US
dc.subject Interpersonal Violence en_US
dc.subject Child Abuse en_US
dc.subject Elder Abuse en_US
dc.subject Community Violence en_US
dc.subject Firearm Violence en_US
dc.subject Sexual Assault en_US
dc.subject Bullying en_US
dc.subject Prevention en_US
dc.subject Cost Effective en_US
dc.subject Interventions en_US
dc.subject Victim Services en_US
dc.title Systematic Review of Violence Prevention Economic Evaluations, 2000–2019 en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account